In the perfect world, policy ideas would be thoroughly tested before public policymakers were called upon to support one idea or another with a large allocation of taxpayer dollars.
But we obviously don’t live in a perfect world, so we often have to settle for testing new ideas and programs after they’ve already been put in motion.
Take e-prescriptions, for example. Over the past couple weeks, a number of states have announced efforts to develop or expand statewide e-prescription programs as an early step toward a more comprehensive implementation of electronic health records.
In Virginia, a group of healthcare executives, pharmacists and other stakeholders has launched an effort to push the commonwealth toward e-prescribing. In Iowa, a public-private collaborative has launched ePrescribe Iowa, a web-based program that will take advantage of Iowa Health System’s HealthNet connect, a 3,200 mile-long fiberoptic network.
Finally, the Vermont Information Technology Leaders Inc. (VITL) recently announced that it will use federal grant funds to try to move Vermont physicians toward greater use of electronic prescriptions.
The move makes sense, as e-prescribing constitutes a relatively simple foray into the world of EHRs. Moreover, in many states, there’s a lot of room for improvement. In Iowa, for example, surveys show that less than 3 percent of all prescriptions written in Iowa in 2008 used e-prescribing. In the policy world, that’s a clear example of low-hanging fruit.
But perhaps the best news of all is that, even as states are jumping onto the e-prescription bandwagon, researchers are launching efforts to determine the effectiveness of e-prescriptions, both in terms of how they can improve patient compliance and how they can lower healthcare costs.
With any luck, state and federal policymakers will be watching this and other similar studies in an effort to improve their programs as they go forward. After all, it’s one thing to come up with an idea and commit the resources to get it moving. It’s another thing altogether to make sure it’s going to work.
Recent Posts
On HIEs, more information would be helpful
Privacy discussion needs prioritizing
“Front line” stories demonstrate provider concerns
Consumer “perspectives” reveal gaps in knowledge
Study shows risks of sharing data
Answer: No. Certification is a qualification for getting ARRA funding, so you must be certified by 2010 in order to collect data and meaningfully use it by 2010. Bonuses under ARRA will be available 2011 on 2010 data. BUT: (caveat) -- under ARRA, HHS must determine a certification body, which they haven't chosen yet. Most experts feel they will choose CCHIT because there is no time to set up another certification body. There also may be other factors involved, such as what certs per year HHS will require under ARRA. Currently, providers are optionally able to update or expand their CCHIT certification each year.
For more information about MedTech Publishing Company and its publications, please visit medtechpublishing.com.
Comments
Post new comment