A recent poll suggests that as federal officials move forward on expanding the role of IT in the healthcare sector, they need to make sure that public is on board when it comes to who gets access to patient data.
The poll, conducted by the Michigan-based Ponemon Institute, clearly indicates that, while the public is largely inclined to allow physicians to share patient data, they are much more wary when it comes to allowing federal officials or non-healthcare private companies the same access.
According to a recent article on the poll in Forbes magazine, “of the 868 Americans surveyed about their views on digitizing and storing health records, only 27% said they would trust a federal agency to store or access the data--the same percentage as those who would trust a technology firm like” Google, Microsoft, or General Electric.
The article rightly points out that federal data storage is not part of the Obama administration’s recent push for electronic health records, but the public’s wariness could certainly impact federal and state policy when it comes to the possibility of having companies such as Google managing web-based healthcare portals.
The survey also found that when “asked to rate the sensitivity of various types of personal information, users rated health records as far more sensitive than other information they typically share with Web companies. On a scale from one to seven, medical data received an average rating of 6.64, while credit card information received only a 4.27 and online search records just a 1.86.”
According to Larry Ponemon, the Institute’s director, "The takeaway message is that people still care about privacy."
That fact, when combined with the recent rise in attempts by hackers to access healthcare data, suggests that policymakers need to put security issues front and center in order to reassure the public about the safety of their personal information.
Recent Posts
Broadband plan raises connectivity questions
On HIEs, more information would be helpful
Privacy discussion needs prioritizing
“Front line” stories demonstrate provider concerns
Consumer “perspectives” reveal gaps in knowledge
Answer: No. Certification is a qualification for getting ARRA funding, so you must be certified by 2010 in order to collect data and meaningfully use it by 2010. Bonuses under ARRA will be available 2011 on 2010 data. BUT: (caveat) -- under ARRA, HHS must determine a certification body, which they haven't chosen yet. Most experts feel they will choose CCHIT because there is no time to set up another certification body. There also may be other factors involved, such as what certs per year HHS will require under ARRA. Currently, providers are optionally able to update or expand their CCHIT certification each year.
For more information about MedTech Publishing Company and its publications, please visit medtechpublishing.com.
Comments
one day i went shopping outside,and in an ed hardy store,I found some kinds of ed hardy i love most they are Your website is really good Thank you for the information edhardy com official site edhardy com official site www edhardy clothes com www edhardy clothes com don ed hardy don ed hardy ed hardy.com ed hardy.com ed hardy clothing official website ed hardy clothing official website cheap ed hardy sunglasses cheap ed hardy sunglasses ed hardy canada ed hardy canada edhardy com clothing edhardy com clothing www edhardy com au www edhardy com au discount ed hardy clothes discount ed hardy clothes shop ed hardy shop ed hardy Thank you for the information
I am looking forward for your next post. I found this informative and interesting blog. I just hope you could make another post related to this. This is definitely worth reading
Post new comment